If you’re a federal retiree, particularly one covered under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), the repeal of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) could have a significant impact on your retirement income. While our previous post covered the broader implications of this change, this article focuses specifically on how it affects federal workers, breaking down potential increases in monthly benefits with real-world examples.
How the WEP and GPO Affected Federal Employees
Many federal workers, particularly those under CSRS, spent their careers in government positions that did not contribute to Social Security. However, if they also worked in Social Security-covered employment for at least 40 quarters (10 years), they were eligible for Social Security benefits. The WEP significantly reduced these benefits, while the GPO cut spousal and survivor benefits—often eliminating them entirely.
With the repeal of these provisions, retirees will now receive their full Social Security benefits, making it easier to plan for long-term financial stability.
How Much More Could Federal Retirees Receive?
To help illustrate the financial impact, let’s look at a few hypothetical examples:
- Example 1: Federal Retiree with Private-Sector Earnings
- Mark, a retired CSRS employee, worked for the federal government for 30 years but also spent 10 years in a Social Security-covered job.
- His Social Security benefit before WEP was $1,200 per month.
- Under WEP, his benefit was reduced by $400, leaving him with $800 per month.
- With the repeal, Mark’s Social Security check increases back to $1,200, which means an extra $400 per month, totaling $4,800 more per year and $144,000 over a 30-year retirement.
- Example 2: Spousal Benefits for a Federal Retiree’s Widow
- Susan, a widow of a CSRS retiree, was entitled to a Social Security survivor benefit of $1,500 per month.
- Under GPO, two-thirds of her government pension ($1,200) was deducted, leaving her with only $300 per month in survivor benefits.
- With the repeal, hypothetically, someone like Susan could potentially receive up to $1,500 per month, which might represent a $1,200 monthly increase. This could amount to an additional $14,400 per year and $432,000 over 30 years, depending on individual circumstances.
- Example 3: Dual Federal and Private-Sector Income
- David worked in federal service for 20 years under CSRS and spent another 15 years in a Social Security-covered job.
- His full Social Security benefit before WEP was $1,800 per month.
- WEP reduced this amount by $600, cutting his payment to $1,200 per month.
- With the repeal, David will now receive his full $1,800 per month, adding $7,200 annually to his income and $216,000 over a 30-year retirement.
Next Steps for Federal Retirees
With the repeal now in place, here’s what federal retirees should do:
- Check Your Updated Benefits – Log in to SSA.gov to see how much your benefit has increased.
- Expect Retroactive Payments – Many retirees will receive back payments for benefits dating to January 2024.
- Consult a Financial Advisor – Increased income may affect taxes, Medicare premiums, and financial planning.
- Apply for Benefits If You Haven’t Already – If you delayed Social Security because of WEP or GPO, now is the time to claim it.
Final Thoughts
For federal retirees, the repeal of WEP and GPO restores benefits that were previously reduced or eliminated. This change could mean hundreds—or even thousands—of dollars more per month, leading to greater financial security over the course of retirement.
If you need assistance understanding how this impacts your specific situation, reach out to a financial professional who specializes in federal benefits and Social Security planning. These changes represent a long-overdue win for federal employees, ensuring that they receive the full retirement benefits they’ve earned.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION: Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended and/or undertaken by BentOak Capital [“BentOak”]), or any non-investment related services, will be profitable, equal any historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. BentOak is neither a law firm, nor a certified public accounting firm, and no portion of its services should be construed as legal or accounting advice. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this document serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for personalized investment advice from BentOak. Please remember that it remains your responsibility to advise BentOak, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services. A copy of our current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request at www.bentoakcapital.com/disclosure. The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. Historical performance results for investment indices, benchmarks, and/or categories have been provided for general informational/comparison purposes only, and generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, nor the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It should not be assumed that your account holdings correspond directly to any comparative indices or categories. Please Also Note: (1) performance results do not reflect the impact of taxes; (2) comparative benchmarks/indices may be more or less volatile than your accounts; and, (3) a description of each comparative benchmark/index is available upon request. Please Note: Limitations: Neither rankings and/or recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, publications, media, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any designation, certification, or license should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if BentOak is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser. Rankings are generally limited to participating advisers (see link as to participation criteria/methodology, to the extent applicable). Unless expressly indicated to the contrary, BentOak did not pay a fee to be included on any such ranking. No ranking or recognition should be construed as a current or past endorsement of BentOak by any of its clients. ANY QUESTIONS: BentOak’s Chief Compliance Officer remains available to address any questions regarding rankings and/or recognitions, including the criteria used for any reflected ranking.